PDA

View Full Version : Iraqis rally, call for U.S. forces to leave


Chuck
April 9th, 2007, 01:12 PM
NAJAF, Iraq (Reuters) - Tens of thousands of people waving Iraqi flags staged a peaceful rally in the southern city of Najaf on Monday to demand the withdrawal of U.S. forces, four years to the day since Baghdad fell to invading American troops.

The streets of the Iraqi capital itself were largely empty after authorities clamped a 24-hour ban on vehicles to prevent any insurgent attacks, especially car bombings.

The anniversary comes as Iraq's Shi'ite-led government is trying to avert full-scale civil war between majority Shi'ites and minority Sunnis who were dominant under
Saddam Hussein. Sunni and Shi'ite clerics marched alongside each other in Najaf.

U.S. military spokesman Rear Admiral Mark Fox said that four years ago U.S.-led forces had "liberated
Iraq from Saddam's republic of fear." That had allowed Iraqis to exercise their democratic rights and stage protests such as the one in Najaf.

"While there have been substantial accomplishments, the first four years have also been disappointing, frustrating and increasingly dangerous in many parts of Iraq," he said.

The protesters in Najaf were responding to a call by powerful anti-American cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, who blames the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003 for the country's woes and wants a timetable set for a U.S. troop withdrawal.

Waving red, white and back Iraqi flags, marchers choked the 7 km-long road between Najaf and neighboring Kufa and clogged streets leading to Sadrayn Square, the main rallying point. Many had come from Baghdad and Shi'ite towns and cities in the south.

Sadr was not at the rally. He has kept out of sight since the Baghdad crackdown. The U.S. military says he is in
Iran, but his aides insist he is still in Iraq, possibly Najaf.

His ability to muster such a large gathering was a signal to the Iraqi government and Washington that, despite his absence from public view, he is still a force to be reckoned with.

The young cleric, popular among Iraq's Shi'ite poor, led two uprisings against U.S. forces in 2004 but has since become a major political player. His movement holds a quarter of the seats in the ruling Shi'ite Alliance.

Washington accuses his Mehdi Army militia of fuelling sectarian violence and says it is now the biggest threat to peace in Iraq, a charge he denies.

SADDAM STATUE

Speaking against the backdrop of an Iraqi flag, a senior Sadrist, cleric Abdelhadi al-Mohammadawi, called on U.S. forces to leave. His speech was interrupted by the periodic chorus of "Leave, leave occupier!" and "No, no, to the occupation."

"We demand the exit of the occupier and withdrawal of the last American soldier and we also reject the existence of any kind of military bases," he said.

U.S.
President George W. Bush has insisted U.S. troops will not leave until Iraqis can take over security and has repeatedly rejected setting a timetable for withdrawal.

While Iraq has a new U.S.-trained army, Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's government is still heavily dependent on American firepower and logistical support to combat the Sunni insurgency. In November, the
U.N. Security Council renewed the mandate of the U.S.-led forces in Iraq until the end of 2007.

"This protest is our demand for sovereignty because we will not stay quiet on the issue. The Iraqi government can handle everything and there is no need for the occupiers to remain and continue killing innocents," said Mohammed Hamza from Baghdad.

Four years ago to the day, the world watched as Iraqis, helped by U.S. soldiers, toppled Saddam's 20-foot (six-meter) statue in Baghdad's central Firdous Square. A crowd trampled over what was left of the statue and danced for joy.

Saddam had vowed to defeat the U.S.-led invasion launched on March 20, 2003, but his forces offered little resistance as U.S. forces thrust deep into the heart of the Iraqi capital.

By then the war had cost 96 American dead, 30 British dead and unknown thousands of Iraqi military and civilian casualties.

Four years on, those tolls have soared to more than 3,270 U.S. soldiers killed, 140 British soldiers, 124 from other nations, and tens of thousands of Iraqis. Ten U.S. soldiers were killed at the weekend.

(Additional reporting by Yara Bayoumy and Mussab Al-Khairalla in Baghdad) (http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070409/ts_nm/iraq_dc_31)

Maxwells
April 9th, 2007, 05:15 PM
How time passes, it does not seem like four years........I think, (My Opinion) they should of pulled the troops out along time ago.

mark
April 9th, 2007, 09:51 PM
.............I hope every one of them has a few guns & plenty of ammo under their clothing IF/WHEN the U.S pulls out.



They certainly will need them then...............see ya mark

tkcomer
April 10th, 2007, 05:12 PM
Ya know, I've aways said this is an illegal war. The Bush administration should be tried for war crimes for starting their war on a sovereign country that had done nothing to us. Everything they have told us for going to war has been exposed as a lie. That said, the people of Iraq want us out. Both sides. The only ones that want us there are the murderous thieves that want us to do the killing for them. We have unleashed a civil war amongst people whose hatred for each other goes back centuries. And never forget, this is not a religious civil war, it's all about power. Who has it. Who wields it. Their religious leaders fire up the ignorant masses in the name of God to gain that power. It's time to leave. It's their country, not ours. They want us out, so be it. We shouldn't have stuck our nose in their business in the first place.

kdown
April 12th, 2007, 02:54 PM
Cost of war in Iraq

Click to see running total

http://nationalpriorities.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=182

mark
April 13th, 2007, 12:48 AM
Cost of war in Iraq

Click to see running total

http://nationalpriorities.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=182

That's sad, however, this is even more sad:

http://zfacts.com/p/789.html

Tragic indeed..........see ya mark

Chuck
April 13th, 2007, 08:19 AM
Have you guy switch to the Liberal side?

Those sites are usually used by Dem's to prove thier point.

KELTYSBOY
April 13th, 2007, 08:37 AM
We can not win by continuing as ususal. If you're going to go to war then go to war. We are the USA. This should not have lasted as long as it has. We have the resources to have completed this mission in no time at all. Either use it or get out, period.

kdown
April 13th, 2007, 08:40 AM
Haven't switched. Just stating the facts

kdown
November 14th, 2007, 09:26 AM
WASHINGTON -- The total cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan could balloon to $3.5 trillion over the next decade because of such "hidden" costs as oil market disruptions, forgone investments, long-term healthcare for veterans and interest payments on borrowed war funding, according to a report released by congressional Democrats on Tuesday.

Here's what that looks like

$ 3,500,000,000,000.00

I think......LOL

TheMan
November 14th, 2007, 10:23 AM
It's time.. We done what we were supposed to do..

Maxwells
November 14th, 2007, 12:12 PM
Bush is ruining this country...we will never get out of debt...he is or whomever is borrowing and borrowing this money to pay for this war....Our Troops need to come home....God Bless Our Troops..He passed a bill to get money from our Treasury of Defense..when is it going to end........